“In fact, as long as the ranking of Top 2 is not dropped, they can select the best students who create excellent works by their own efforts; creating a monopoly on talent and reputation. But these students can shine everywhere, UAL is not worthy of its students.”
After years of UAL victimization
To be honest, I felt like I was being cut off by a developed country at some moments in my class at UAL - the lecturer on the stage was talking about some very low information density crap, Everyone knew that they were bad at speaking, even themselves, and people kept leaving the classroom, and then the lecturer was really tired. So it was time for self-study.
Is it illegal to take classes seriously at UAL?
I wonder why such people can also be Top2 teachers, they speak so bad.
More often than not, it was an insoluble anger that I had overcome so many difficulties, After paying so much - language, culture, eating habits, high tuition fees, thousands of miles away from home and friends, expecting you to lead me with excellent teaching quality and let me learn something, and this is what you bring to me?
I might as well watch YouTube at home. At least the teachers there know what they are talking about.
Of course, I know that the United Kingdom is very important to self-study, especially master, teachers are regarded as mature researchers and artists. The nice thing about it is that you can do whatever you want with your homework, and nobody cares anyway.
Tuition fees for international students in UK higher education already account for 5% of the UK's GDP. It is also true to say that our tuition fees are an important part of the UK economy, but do the universities give international students and high tuition fees the attention they deserve? Is there a good transition or adequate support for international students?
It is not so much that the support system does not keep up as it is that they do not want to keep up. Anyway, one year is gone and there is a steady stream of new students coming next year. Why should the school increase production costs from a commercial point of view?
Neglect the feelings of international students does not affect its smooth functioning, because most international students will not resist, and even if they do, it is useless. You can make essays against UAL at graduation, you can pull a banner against UAL at school, and you can wear a slogan against UAL at graduation. But nothing changes.
In fact, as long as the UAL Top 2 ranking does not drop, this kind of drumming can go on forever - selecting some excellent students.
In fact, as long as the ranking of UAL Top 2 is not dropped, this scam like drumming and passing flowers can go on forever - selecting the best students who create excellent works by their own efforts. Then the UAL claims credit for itself and goes on to attract more students, thereby creating a monopoly on talent and reputation, but these students can shine everywhere, and the UAL sometimes even hurts the light, and is not worthy of its students.
Last year after the end of term 3, I went to Wales to work for a night and talked to a guest who was a teacher in the UK and said that most of the students in my class were Chinese.
The guest apologized and said, "I'm sorry our country treats you like this, it's wrong."
It turns out that UAL's behavior has been so outrageous that it needs an apology from a stranger in the UK who has nothing to do with it.
But UAL still does it. It really doesn't care about international students. In fact, it's not just international students. It has so many students that it doesn't care about any of them.
To be honest, I think most of the Chinese students are brilliant, smart and hardworking. The average learning ability and ability to withstand pressure are among the best of all ethnic groups, but in the UK you can't get the same feeling as in China, because you don't know how to exert yourself, and when you finally find the feeling, it is time to graduate.
What you get finally from the UAL seems to be the graduation certificate, the tool of education in alienation has never been so obvious.
Sometimes I even wonder how a UAL student ID card suggests luxury. The conclusion is that luxury should not bring me a year of psychological shadow, it destroy my expectations, confidence, and passion for art and design.
Rather than actively destroy it, it is just that no one cares, and this phenomenon cannot be improved.
It seems to have been said a hundred times, if I had to do it over again I would pick Goldsmith, I would get at least the same gain without paying so much for not having to go through so many moments of frustration and self-doubt. Unfortunately, life can not be repeated, whether good or bad is life, I can only comfort myself This experience has made me more tenacious and brave, disenchant by so-called title the famous school, because at any time I am more important than what I belong to a place.
I am not dissuading UAL, because everyone's situation is different, just out of my own personal experience to write some real feelings, choose the place you want to go, at least you can personally verify whether it is worthy.
And UAL is not useless. UAL has very rich resources, l used to write about their academic, employment, and scholarship. I used to write about how I can make use of the absolute value of my tuition. I also met a lot of students in UAL. I am very happy for them. It's just not a place for me.
Finally, I would like to say to the students who are very unhappy in UAL that it is not you, there are many reasons, such as school problems, cultural problems, teachers problems, language problems, learning style problems and so on.
Repost permitted by the author for distribution on feed-back.net.